| Author |
Message |
KoBeS_CaDeTs
|
|
Post subject: Kobe at 2 or 3??
 Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 10:21 PM PST
|
|
Topbuzz Newbie
Joined: Jan 16, 2008
Posts: 10
Location: Las Vegas
  
Status: Offline
|
|
| Kobe has seen a lot of time at the 3 lately and has been doing great grabbing 10 plus rebonds in a couple of games so should we mix it up and start him there?? The lineup would be fisher, farmar, kobe, odom, and brown/turiaf. Imo that's our beat line up What u guys think? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
purple_and_gold_blood
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 10:25 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan
Joined: Jan 26, 2008
Posts: 510
votes: 5
Status: Offline
|
|
idk i think kobe could play the three only if we get j kidd
i was thinking maybe they start jason,derek,and put kobe as the three but idk i doubt it so most likely 2 |
_________________
Phil Jackson
"I thrive on challenges, and there is no more imposing challenge for someone in my profession than winning an NBA title."
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 10:29 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan
![]()
Joined: Oct 21, 2007 Age: 23
Posts: 655
|
|
| i said last week that kobe should play at the 3 and have sasha at the 2 but some people said Nay if you watch the game closy you notice right the most effetive line up is when kobe is at the 3 . if we get kidd the kobe at the tree and fish at the two would be awsome . |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Gmoney818
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 10:32 PM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: 1226
votes: 3
Status: Offline
|
|
| right now , 2... when crittenton develops and farmar starts (assuming we dont get kidd), the line up should look like my signature |
_________________
 all day
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Since84
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 10:36 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan
![]()
Joined: Dec 14, 2007
Posts: 925
Location: Las Vegas
votes: 2
Status: Offline
|
|
| I love Kobe at the 3! Might cut down on the jumpshots he takes. I love him posting up. Creates a lot for everyone. |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Lakers_4_Lyfe_BayBay
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 11:03 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM
Joined: Aug 06, 2007
Posts: 4347
votes: 29
Status: Offline
|
|
Yea, I would like a lineup of :
PG Farmar
SG Fisher
SF Kobe
PF Lamar
C Turiaf |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
kb24_4life
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 11:42 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM
Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 3627
votes: 17
Status: Offline
|
|
I just don't want Kobe to get injured...that's the main concern...most strong forwards are bigger than shooting guards...but Kobe doesn't get injured...these past couple of games he's gone down hard...hit his head, hit his wrist on the floor, got his ankle a little tangled up, dived over the scorers table for a loose ball, etc...if Kobe goes down, well, kiss the season good bye...
Now, I like when Kobe plays the 3 and Fisher & Farmar are in the backcourt...but maybe Sasha should start and Walton goes to the bench...Farmar is the leader of the bench and he's who gets the bench players involved...plus he's a real nice spark off the bench...shooting those 3's with perfection... |
_________________
Yeah, it's a new ballgame now fella...I got guns now, I aint going into the shootout with butter knives no more...I got guns now, now we gonna see what's up..."
-Kobe Bryant
21,927
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
LakerFanatik
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 11:43 PM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 1163
Location: The City of Angels baby!!!
votes: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
| Kobe is best at his natural position. But he's like Magic and can play any position. Except for PF and C. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Since84
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 11:49 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan
![]()
Joined: Dec 14, 2007
Posts: 925
Location: Las Vegas
votes: 2
Status: Offline
|
|
| Yeah, NOBODY has ever been able to do what Magic did. |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
LakerFanatik
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 11:49 PM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 1163
Location: The City of Angels baby!!!
votes: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Since84 wrote:
Yeah, NOBODY has ever been able to do what Magic did.
Agreed! Magic was the man!!! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Since84
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 11:52 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan
![]()
Joined: Dec 14, 2007
Posts: 925
Location: Las Vegas
votes: 2
Status: Offline
|
|
| He is the reason I started watching the NBA and became a devout Laker fan! |
_________________
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
LakerFanatik
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 28, 2008 - 11:58 PM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 1163
Location: The City of Angels baby!!!
votes: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
| Watching Magic, Kareem, Scott, Worthy and the Coop was amazing. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
WILT100
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Kobe at 2 or 3??
Posted: Jan 29, 2008 - 12:30 AM PST
|
|
Casual Laker Fan
Joined: Mar 21, 2007
Posts: 163
Status: Offline
|
|
[quote="Lakers_4_Lyfe_BayBay"]Yea, I would like a lineup of :
PG Farmar
SG Fisher
SF Kobe
PF Lamar
C Turiaf[/quote
I think this is their best lineup right now |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
lakersandangels
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 06, 2008 - 02:48 AM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan
Joined: Nov 19, 2007
Posts: 897
votes: 2
Status: Offline
|
|
| I would keep Kobe at the 1 now that we have Gasol. Before Gasol I would have kept him at the 1 as well. |
_________________
If you are an Angel fan, consider angels.topbuzz.com We are trying to develop the site and get it some popularity.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Sub-Forum
