| Author |
Message |
lakersfanjeff
|
|
Post subject: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 04:41 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM

Joined: Aug 12, 2009 Age: 23
Posts: 3093
Location: Pasadena, CA

  votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
1. Ron Artest has struggled in his first few games with the Lakers while Trevor Ariza has thrived in Houston. Is Artest experiencing some adjustment pains, or are the Lakers destined to regret choosing Artest over Ariza?
Ian Thomsen: In early July, the Lakers felt they would have a hard time driving the price of Ariza's contract down to the mid-level exception (which he ultimately accepted from Houston). Artest's mid-level contract with L.A. was actually smaller than the salary Ariza was seeking. Based on the speed of their decision to forego Ariza, the Lakers viewed it as a no-brainer to quickly sign Artest while leaving enough money in reserve to also retain Lamar Odom and Shannon Brown. Ariza is a versatile complementary forward, and Rockets coach Rick Adelman is bringing out the best in him. But no one should think Ariza would be scoring 33 points for the Lakers, as he did for Houston against the Blazers the other day. Artest will prove to be an upgrade over Ariza, and there hasn't been any meaningful evidence yet to change my opinion. Is Artest going to be high maintenance? Of course. But we won't know until later in the season whether the daily issues he creates are wearing out his teammates and Phil Jackson.
Jack McCallum: Is there any player in the league more prone to emotional volatility, more likely to have high highs and low lows, than Artest? (OK, maybe Stephen Jackson, the subject of the next question.) Artest was so gung-ho about making a name in a new city with a new team that his nervousness and inconsistency could've been predicted. I love Ariza -- he was my nominated breakout player in last year's postseason -- but Artest will figure it out soon ... or Kobe Bryant or Phil Jackson will figure it out for him.
Chris Mannix: The triangle is the most complicated offense in the league, so it was predictable that someone like Artest -- a motion-based or low-post player for most of his career -- would struggle picking it up right away. Likewise, Ariza's numbers were supposed to spike playing on a Houston team without a lot of offensive options. Still, my original prediction stands: The Lakers will rue going for the proverbial jugular by adding a combustible star like Artest and letting a smooth fit like Ariza walk away.
Arash Markazi: You can't just go off statistics when comparing the two, because Ariza is getting a chance to put up big numbers as a go-to guy while Artest is the Lakers' third or fourth option. That said, Ariza has played better early, but Artest is starting to find his role. He isn't being asked to put up 15-20 shots, but instead be a shutdown defender and score when he's open. Against the Hawks on Sunday, Artest had his best night as a Laker -- but not because he had 12 points, seven rebounds and four assists. It was because of his defense. Joe Johnson scored 18 points on Kobe in the first quarter before Artest switched on to him. Johnson scored only nine points the rest of the game as the Lakers won.
Link: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/b ... le.artest/ |
_________________ Chick Hearn will always be my favorite Laker. The Lakers are the champions, you don't have to like it, but you have to live with it.
There's no "i" in team, but there is in win.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
lakeshowsd
|
|
Post subject: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 04:46 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM



Joined: Dec 20, 2008 Age: 28
Posts: 2594
Location: North Bend, OR
  votes: 32
Status: Offline
|
|
| I love Trevor but Artest is going to shut him down. |
_________________ "No center in the NBA scores 20 per game easier than Andrew Bynum." - lakeshowsd
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
laker2thegrave
|
|
Post subject: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 07:13 PM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan

Joined: Jun 30, 2007
Posts: 1189
  votes: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
I will preface this comment with the point that I was an Ariza fan and would have preferred him to stay and have LA make the title defense.
By the end of the season we will have read probably hundreds of articles and debated this point about a thousand times. The only true deciding factor will be if the Lakers win or lose the title and even then there is a debate only if they lose. Even then it will be a pointless agrument because the Ariza camp will say it was losing him that lost the title. The Artest camp would say it was some other factor that caused the lost title which would probably be right.
Frankly we should expect Ariza's numbers to be better all year. He is at worse the number 2 option any night. Also, he does not have to adjust his game at all. He gets more minutes in Houston than LA, shots more, and pretty much is allowed to do what he feels is necessary. Ariza also is not learning a complicated offense this year. It is always easy to ratchet up the scoring opportunities. At some level most NBA players were the primary scorer in college or HS, so you always know how to score.
Artest has a far different adjustment. He comes to a ready made team. He has to adjust from being a number 1 or 2 option down to a number 4 option and that is a lot tougher. He basically has to 'shutdown' some of his game for the better of the whole. Also, he is learning the triangle. For those that have seen the games you can see Artest thinking and pausing out there as he is trying to decide where to go. Artest is really being asked to do the tougher thing right now.
BTW -- Still mad at Ariza's agent for letting it get that far anyway. Sorry could not resist. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
urkle9
|
|
Post subject: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 09:20 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM

Joined: Oct 06, 2008
Posts: 3651

  votes: 16
Status: Offline
|
|
| Put it like this, If the rockets make the playoffs with trevor ariza, we made a mistake....Because i dont know who the hell is playing for the rockets, but they are winning games somehow. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
COnDEMnED
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:05 PM PST
|
|
Serious Laker Fan


Joined: Jun 26, 2008 Age: 24
Posts: 276

  votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
|
urkle9 wrote:
Put it like this, If the rockets make the playoffs with trevor ariza, we made a mistake....Because i dont know who the hell is playing for the rockets, but they are winning games somehow.
This is wrong. Rockets bench has the capability to play very well, alot of the time. This team is similar to the team the Lakers faced last year in the playoffs after Ming went down. Difference being we switch Artest for Ariza.
Players you dont know who are playing for the Rockets:
Battier
Brooks
Hayes
Landry
Lowry
Scola
These are hustle players. How can you not know who they are? Did you live under a rock durring the playoffs last year, and the years before? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
LakerSupporter9
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:24 PM PST
|
|
Serious Laker Fan


Joined: Feb 28, 2009 Age: 18
Posts: 283
Location: Los Angeles

               votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
Battier is pretty good. He defended Kobe pretty darn well during last playoffs.
& Brooks is good, too. He's young & quick. Watch out for this dude.
Anyways, it's gonna be interesting to watch the game tomorrow. |
_________________ "Ask not what your teammates can do for you.
Ask what you can do for your teammates. "
-Magic Johnson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
sonsnameiskobe
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:31 PM PST
|
|
Topbuzz Newbie


Joined: Oct 13, 2009 Age: 22
Posts: 46

 
Status: Offline
|
|
| artest won the game for us tonite in the fourth he had twenty points and five steals |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
OCLakerfan8
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:36 PM PST
|
|
Serious Laker Fan

Joined: Jun 16, 2006
Posts: 201
   votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
| Tonight's game was a great example of why Artest was an uprgrade from Ariza. In the beginning of the fourth when Kobe sits and rests it was Artest, Bynum, I think LO was in there and reserves. OKC had zeroed in on Defense to make our ball movement stagnant and to make things worse that unit had no one that could create one on one offense, except Ron. Last year I think the Lakers would have lost the game in regulation. I love Ariza and yes he was a perfect fit for the lakers, but last year he could not create for himself last year. Ron kept the Lakers close enough while OKC was building momentum. Yeah Durant torched him in the first half, but Ron Ron (With help) sure did a number on Durantula in the 2nd half and OT. I liked how he kept on bodying up on Durant and forced him out of his sweet spot. I'll give Durant 28 points on 10/24 shooting when he's a career 45% shooter. Also 0-8 threes for a career 35% guy, that's a pretty good job. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
FISH+SWISH
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:37 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM


Joined: Sep 15, 2007 Age: 17
Posts: 3339
Location: La Habra, O.C, California

  votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
| im pretty sure ariza will score more than artest, especially since he is like their go to guy. . i just hope everyone sees the big picture, and notices the key things that make artest better than ariza. . .better passer, hard to stop driving into the paint, tougher, and overall he has more of an impact on the game. . .don't let the stats fool you guys. I don't want to hear " ariza had 22 pts artest only had 12, he is clearly better". |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
PlzOPH3T
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:37 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan

Joined: Jun 16, 2009
Posts: 507
  votes: 10
Status: Offline
|
|
|
urkle9 wrote:
Put it like this, If the rockets make the playoffs with trevor ariza, we made a mistake....Because i dont know who the hell is playing for the rockets, but they are winning games somehow.
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Cobbler
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:37 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan


Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 734
     votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
urkle9 wrote:
Put it like this, If the rockets make the playoffs with trevor ariza, we made a mistake....Because i dont know who the hell is playing for the rockets, but they are winning games somehow.
If ??????
I have read nothing but post after post from you for weeks on how it was DEFINETELY a mistake.
Your post makes no sense at all. The Rockets made the playoffs 5 of the last 6 years. Took the Lakers to 7 games in a tough series. Within your post you admit you dont even know who are on the rockets... but then make a blanket statement about the ONE Laker you actually like. Correction..... Ex Laker.  |
_________________ "The obvious thing is you understand the season is meant for a growth process,and you hope your playoff position is good enough you can make an effort in the playoffs." Phil Jackson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
FISH+SWISH
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:45 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM


Joined: Sep 15, 2007 Age: 17
Posts: 3339
Location: La Habra, O.C, California

  votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
| why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING! |
Last edited by FISH+SWISH on Nov 03, 2009 - 11:46 PM PST; edited 1 time in total
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Cobbler
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:45 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan


Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 734
     votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
FISH+SWISH wrote:
im pretty sure ariza will score more than artest, especially since he is like their go to guy. . i just hope everyone sees the big picture, and notices the key things that make artest better than ariza. . .better passer, hard to stop driving into the paint, tougher, and overall he has more of an impact on the game. . .don't let the stats fool you guys. I don't want to hear " ariza had 22 pts artest only had 12, he is clearly better".
It's not even close on a basketball level. The only thing the Laker haters hang their hats on is that Ron will go bonkers and disrupt the team. I keep hearing how he's going to chuck up ill advised shots and disrupt the flow of the offense. Oh wait... that was Kobe tonight... yet I'm not hearing how we are worse off with him.
This game goes as a loss tonight without Ron and furthermore... a loss as well if Ariza was here instead. |
_________________ "The obvious thing is you understand the season is meant for a growth process,and you hope your playoff position is good enough you can make an effort in the playoffs." Phil Jackson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
FISH+SWISH
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:49 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM


Joined: Sep 15, 2007 Age: 17
Posts: 3339
Location: La Habra, O.C, California

  votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Cobbler wrote:
FISH+SWISH wrote:
im pretty sure ariza will score more than artest, especially since he is like their go to guy. . i just hope everyone sees the big picture, and notices the key things that make artest better than ariza. . .better passer, hard to stop driving into the paint, tougher, and overall he has more of an impact on the game. . .don't let the stats fool you guys. I don't want to hear " ariza had 22 pts artest only had 12, he is clearly better".
It's not even close on a basketball level. The only thing the Laker haters hang their hats on is that Ron will go bonkers and disrupt the team. I keep hearing how he's going to chuck up ill advised shots and disrupt the flow of the offense. Oh wait... that was Kobe tonight... yet I'm not hearing how we are worse off with him.
This game goes as a loss tonight without Ron and furthermore... a loss as well if Ariza was here instead.
well put cobbler, i haven't seen artest shoot 1 bad shot so far, he's actually being very unselfish in order to keep his teammates happy. . .he only was a distraction for 1 team, the Pacers. He didn't do anything bad in Sac or Houston. Artest Blowing up is just an excuse that people use to make his game look bad. . very underrated player |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Nay511
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:52 PM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan


Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Posts: 2027

  votes: 17
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
 |
COnDEMnED
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:54 PM PST
|
|
Serious Laker Fan


Joined: Jun 26, 2008 Age: 24
Posts: 276

  votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
|
FISH+SWISH wrote:
why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING!
This is right in a sence, but If I made numerous posts about how Smush Parker was the best player to walk the face of the earth, and the Lakers were lucky to have him, and ignored everyone who tried to tell me otherwise, would I have a right to my opinion? Sure. Would everyone else have the right to tell me what an idiot I am. Absolutely. Its my opinion and my right to be completely oblivious to the game of basketball and those around me who obviously have more knowledge. But its not my right to take my rediculous opinion and state it as fact. |
Last edited by COnDEMnED on Nov 04, 2009 - 12:01 AM PST; edited 2 times in total
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
FISH+SWISH
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:56 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM


Joined: Sep 15, 2007 Age: 17
Posts: 3339
Location: La Habra, O.C, California

  votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Nay511 wrote:
Nay, like i said. . don't let the stats fool you. Ariza is currently Houstons go to player,while artest is currently the lakers 3rd best player (4th when gasol comes back). Be honest would ariza have won us the game like artest did today, while being the third option? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Cobbler
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:58 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan


Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 734
     votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
FISH+SWISH wrote:
why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING!
Since you ask I'll answer.
Everyone of us has moments of frustration with the team. We all have players we like and those we have reservations about. ie. our opinions.
The difference is... where you or I may say... "darn Bynum had a awful game tonight, he lacked the fire, he needs to pick it up" Urkle will say. Friggen Bynum sucks, he's always been soft, we wont even make it to WCF much less have a chance for the finals as long as he's our Center. I'll bet my life on it.
This isnt a rare occasion. It's about every game, FO move, and the majority of the players. The only player i have seen him actually stand up for....all this time... is of all people... Trevor. The one that left! But... as usual... that was all the FO's fault.
In other words... while everyone gets negative from time to time... Urkles posts are doomsday negative 90% +. It just gets old. And just as you say, he's entitled to his opinion. With that, I am just as entitled to refute it.
N |
_________________ "The obvious thing is you understand the season is meant for a growth process,and you hope your playoff position is good enough you can make an effort in the playoffs." Phil Jackson
Last edited by Cobbler on Nov 04, 2009 - 12:05 AM PST; edited 1 time in total
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
FISH+SWISH
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 03, 2009 - 11:59 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM


Joined: Sep 15, 2007 Age: 17
Posts: 3339
Location: La Habra, O.C, California

  votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
COnDEMnED wrote:
FISH+SWISH wrote:
why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING!
This is right in a sence, but If I made numerous posts about how Smush Parker was the best player to walk the face of the earth, and the Lakers were lucky to have him, and ignored everyone who tried to tell me otherwise, would I have a right to my opinion? Sure. Would everyone else have the right to tell me what an idiot I am. Absolutely. Its my opinion and my right to be completely oblivious to the game of basketball and those around me who obviously have more knowledge. But its not my right to take my rediculous opinion and state it as fact.
LMAO with the smush comment, well i agree with you man, but now it seems theres always a negative post towards urkle, if you don't agree with the guy and don't get along with him, then just don't pay attention to him, but don't attack him. . (this post wasn't directed towards you Condemned, im just saying) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
FISH+SWISH
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 12:01 AM PST
|
|
Laker GM


Joined: Sep 15, 2007 Age: 17
Posts: 3339
Location: La Habra, O.C, California

  votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Cobbler wrote:
FISH+SWISH wrote:
why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING!
Since you ask I'll answer.
Everyone of us has moments of frustration with the team. We all have players we like and those we have reservations about. ie. our opinions.
The difference is... where you or I may say... "darn Bynum had a awful game tonight, he lacked the fire, he needs to pick it up" Urkle will say. Friggen Bynum sucks, he's always been soft, we wont even make it to WCF much less have a chance for the finals as long as he's our Center.
This isnt a rare occasion. It's about every game, FO move, and the majorityh of the players. The only player i have seen hos actually stand up for....all this time... is of all people... Trevor. The one that left. But... as usual... that was all the FO's fault.
In other words... while everyone gets negative from time to time... Urkles posts are doomsday negative 90% +. It just gets old. And just as you say, he's entitled to his opinion. With that, I am just as entitled to refute it.
N
no arguement here cobbler, i see where you are coming from |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Cobbler
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 12:01 AM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan


Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 734
     votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Nay511 wrote:
3 games!
Put up the career stats.... |
_________________ "The obvious thing is you understand the season is meant for a growth process,and you hope your playoff position is good enough you can make an effort in the playoffs." Phil Jackson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Nay511
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 12:05 AM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan


Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Posts: 2027

  votes: 17
Status: Offline
|
|
|
FISH+SWISH wrote:
Nay511 wrote:
Nay, like i said. . don't let the stats fool you. Ariza is currently Houstons go to player,while artest is currently the lakers 3rd best player (4th when gasol comes back). Be honest would ariza have won us the game like artest did today, while being the third option?
What Im really paying attention to is Ariza's FG % (.475) and his 3 point % (.520) . He is also averaging 1.75 steals.
Hope we can get someone via trade for either Sasha, Farmar, or Morrison that can duplicate what Ariza can do. |
_________________ "This is your World Champion Lakers' basketball network!" - Chick Hearn
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
FISH+SWISH
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 12:15 AM PST
|
|
Laker GM


Joined: Sep 15, 2007 Age: 17
Posts: 3339
Location: La Habra, O.C, California

  votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Nay511 wrote:
FISH+SWISH wrote:
Nay511 wrote:
Nay, like i said. . don't let the stats fool you. Ariza is currently Houstons go to player,while artest is currently the lakers 3rd best player (4th when gasol comes back). Be honest would ariza have won us the game like artest did today, while being the third option?
What Im really paying attention to is Ariza's FG % (.475) and his 3 point % (.520) . He is also averaging 1.75 steals.
Hope we can get someone via trade for either Sasha, Farmar, or Morrison that can duplicate what Ariza can do.
we won't theres to much talent on this team to add someone like that |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Cobbler
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 12:16 AM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan


Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 734
     votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
| Ariza is going to have a good year with Houston. Both are good players. I personally wish him all the best. He can average 30 - 10- 5 for all I care and I will still say Artest is better suited for us come PLAYOFF time. If we were developing a team to win championships in 3 years and beyond... then Ariza would have been the proper choice due to his youth. To win NOW.... Ron is the best choice. |
_________________ "The obvious thing is you understand the season is meant for a growth process,and you hope your playoff position is good enough you can make an effort in the playoffs." Phil Jackson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
COnDEMnED
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 12:28 AM PST
|
|
Serious Laker Fan


Joined: Jun 26, 2008 Age: 24
Posts: 276

  votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
|
FISH+SWISH wrote:
COnDEMnED wrote:
FISH+SWISH wrote:
why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING!
This is right in a sence, but If I made numerous posts about how Smush Parker was the best player to walk the face of the earth, and the Lakers were lucky to have him, and ignored everyone who tried to tell me otherwise, would I have a right to my opinion? Sure. Would everyone else have the right to tell me what an idiot I am. Absolutely. Its my opinion and my right to be completely oblivious to the game of basketball and those around me who obviously have more knowledge. But its not my right to take my rediculous opinion and state it as fact.
LMAO with the smush comment, well i agree with you man, but now it seems theres always a negative post towards urkle, if you don't agree with the guy and don't get along with him, then just don't pay attention to him, but don't attack him. . (this post wasn't directed towards you Condemned, im just saying)
Again, I agree with this. But there is a time for love, and there is a time for war. How long must one endure the essence of obtuse opinion?
If you and I were locked in a room together, and we both had girlfriends, one day I walk over to you and your girlfriend and grab her a**, right in front of you. The next day im sitting with my girlfriend in the corner of the room, and I get up and walk over to your girlfriend and grab her a** again, turn around and sit back down. Then the next day while you guys are eating breakfast I grab your girlfriends a** again. Say this goes on for weeks and months. One day Im going to grab your girlfriends a**, and your going to kick me in the balls. And rightfully so. This is the same experience most people have with said person, except we really are locked in a room together (this website),and we dont have the power to kick him in the balls. The only hope we have is to try to educate the poor fella. This is why it is not always easy to be the bigger man, and "turn the other cheek" |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
4lakers
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 02:21 AM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan


Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Posts: 1868
Location: Los Angeles

   votes: 26
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Cobbler wrote:
Ariza is going to have a good year with Houston. Both are good players. I personally wish him all the best. He can average 30 - 10- 5 for all I care and I will still say Artest is better suited for us come PLAYOFF time. If we were developing a team to win championships in 3 years and beyond... then Ariza would have been the proper choice due to his youth. To win NOW.... Ron is the best choice.
Did I miss something - or was I delusional and thought that the Lakers just had a parade this year and everyone was chanting ARIZA at the Coliseum? I thought the exact same team with Ariza just won the championship? Must of been just a sweet dream or something.
Lucky then we got Artest or we would of had to wait three years to win a title. |
_________________ Hey Orlando, do you like fishsticks? I hope so because Derek Fisher gave you a double serving in LA’s 97-91 OT victory.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Cobbler
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 03:00 AM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan


Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 734
     votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
4lakers wrote:
Cobbler wrote:
Ariza is going to have a good year with Houston. Both are good players. I personally wish him all the best. He can average 30 - 10- 5 for all I care and I will still say Artest is better suited for us come PLAYOFF time. If we were developing a team to win championships in 3 years and beyond... then Ariza would have been the proper choice due to his youth. To win NOW.... Ron is the best choice.
Did I miss something - or was I delusional and thought that the Lakers just had a parade this year and everyone was chanting ARIZA at the Coliseum? I thought the exact same team with Ariza just won the championship? Must of been just a sweet dream or something.
Lucky then we got Artest or we would of had to wait three years to win a title.
You didnt miss anything. The point i was trying to make, rather poorly I guess, was that Artest is in his prime now while Ariza is a few years away. I am in no way taking away any of the contributions Trevor made in the playoffs but until he can prove that on a consistant basis I conclude that he got on a hot streak at the best of possible times. The career numbers support this. I have no doubt that the Lakers would be contenders with Ariza. I just believe that we also got fortunate to not run into the Cav's or Celts in the playoffs. Do i think we would have won? Yes, cause if anything... I am an optimist about this team. Would Trevor have had as good a finals against Pierce or Lebron? I'm guessing not. But it's all a moot point as we will never know.
If you had to choose between Artest or Ariza to guard Pierce or LBJ.... who whould you choose? I still feel to win NOW... we are better off with Ron. If i was thinking long term and surrounding Bynum with talent I'd choose Ariza. I think the FO was thinking along the same lines. They have the core of Bynum, Gasol, LO, Kobe, and Artest set for a sloid 5 year run. |
_________________ "The obvious thing is you understand the season is meant for a growth process,and you hope your playoff position is good enough you can make an effort in the playoffs." Phil Jackson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
urkle9
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 09:34 AM PST
|
|
Laker GM

Joined: Oct 06, 2008
Posts: 3651

  votes: 16
Status: Offline
|
|
|
COnDEMnED wrote:
FISH+SWISH wrote:
why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING!
This is right in a sence, but If I made numerous posts about how Smush Parker was the best player to walk the face of the earth, and the Lakers were lucky to have him, and ignored everyone who tried to tell me otherwise, would I have a right to my opinion? Sure. Would everyone else have the right to tell me what an idiot I am. Absolutely. Its my opinion and my right to be completely oblivious to the game of basketball and those around me who obviously have more knowledge. But its not my right to take my rediculous opinion and state it as fact.
Again, your not too smart... Its not a Smush Parker/Derek Fisher question.. Ariza was crucial in the playoffs.. Offense and defense. Try to compare oranges to oranges next time. If Artest does something dumb, which he usually does and it hurts the team....I'm gonna say I told you so.. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
COnDEMnED
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 09:58 AM PST
|
|
Serious Laker Fan


Joined: Jun 26, 2008 Age: 24
Posts: 276

  votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
| Right over your head huh? It's ok champ! Keep working at it buddy, you'll get it! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
4lakers
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 03:17 PM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan


Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Posts: 1868
Location: Los Angeles

   votes: 26
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Cobbler wrote:
4lakers wrote:
Cobbler wrote:
Ariza is going to have a good year with Houston. Both are good players. I personally wish him all the best. He can average 30 - 10- 5 for all I care and I will still say Artest is better suited for us come PLAYOFF time. If we were developing a team to win championships in 3 years and beyond... then Ariza would have been the proper choice due to his youth. To win NOW.... Ron is the best choice.
Did I miss something - or was I delusional and thought that the Lakers just had a parade this year and everyone was chanting ARIZA at the Coliseum? I thought the exact same team with Ariza just won the championship? Must of been just a sweet dream or something.
Lucky then we got Artest or we would of had to wait three years to win a title.
You didnt miss anything. The point i was trying to make, rather poorly I guess, was that Artest is in his prime now while Ariza is a few years away. I am in no way taking away any of the contributions Trevor made in the playoffs but until he can prove that on a consistant basis I conclude that he got on a hot streak at the best of possible times. The career numbers support this. I have no doubt that the Lakers would be contenders with Ariza. I just believe that we also got fortunate to not run into the Cav's or Celts in the playoffs. Do i think we would have won? Yes, cause if anything... I am an optimist about this team. Would Trevor have had as good a finals against Pierce or Lebron? I'm guessing not. But it's all a moot point as we will never know.
If you had to choose between Artest or Ariza to guard Pierce or LBJ.... who whould you choose? I still feel to win NOW... we are better off with Ron. If i was thinking long term and surrounding Bynum with talent I'd choose Ariza. I think the FO was thinking along the same lines. They have the core of Bynum, Gasol, LO, Kobe, and Artest set for a sloid 5 year run.
These are excellent points Cobbler. I see your logic in these points. I am a big Ariza fan and am still lamenting the fact that he is with Houston now.
I suppose time will tell when the playoffs come if the Lakers staff could of negotiated more then two days with Ariza - but that is also moot now. I have seen some sparks of life from Artest in this last game with scoring 20 and getting 5 boards or so - a nice effort. I also saw some of that defense he is famous for against Joe Johnson - he really did clamp down on him.
The only thing I'm worried about is when he (Artest) faces these quicker guys. Joe Johnson is a deadly shooter, but hardly a speedster or high fly act. When we face Melo, Lebron and Pierce I suppose many questions will be answered if Artest still has the speed to keep up with these good small forwards.
It just pains me to see a 24 year old Ariza shooting 52% from behind the 3-point line and 47% from the field and averaging 21 points per game and think we could of retained him somehow. Surely he would not be scoring that with the Lakers, but he did shoot 47% from the 3-point line in the finals. This shows confidence and a winner to do that in the finals. I wish Ariza the best as well. |
_________________ Hey Orlando, do you like fishsticks? I hope so because Derek Fisher gave you a double serving in LA’s 97-91 OT victory.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Cobbler
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 06:13 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan


Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 734
     votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
urkle9 wrote:
COnDEMnED wrote:
FISH+SWISH wrote:
why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING!
This is right in a sence, but If I made numerous posts about how Smush Parker was the best player to walk the face of the earth, and the Lakers were lucky to have him, and ignored everyone who tried to tell me otherwise, would I have a right to my opinion? Sure. Would everyone else have the right to tell me what an idiot I am. Absolutely. Its my opinion and my right to be completely oblivious to the game of basketball and those around me who obviously have more knowledge. But its not my right to take my rediculous opinion and state it as fact.
Again, your not too smart... Its not a Smush Parker/Derek Fisher question.. Ariza was crucial in the playoffs.. Offense and defense. Try to compare oranges to oranges next time. If Artest does something dumb, which he usually does and it hurts the team....I'm gonna say I told you so..
A blind squirrel finds a nut every once in awhile. The pure volume of your negative anti-laker posts suggests that sooner or later you might actually call something correct. You dont even believe many of your own ridiculous posts as witnessed by your refusal to back it up last year.
.... so go ahead and say you told us so when you actually get something correct. I certainly wont be holding my breath.  |
_________________ "The obvious thing is you understand the season is meant for a growth process,and you hope your playoff position is good enough you can make an effort in the playoffs." Phil Jackson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
spankees
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 06:22 PM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan


Joined: Dec 15, 2008 Age: 100
Posts: 1851
Location: Los Angeles

     votes: 16
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Cobbler wrote:
urkle9 wrote:
COnDEMnED wrote:
FISH+SWISH wrote:
why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING!
This is right in a sence, but If I made numerous posts about how Smush Parker was the best player to walk the face of the earth, and the Lakers were lucky to have him, and ignored everyone who tried to tell me otherwise, would I have a right to my opinion? Sure. Would everyone else have the right to tell me what an idiot I am. Absolutely. Its my opinion and my right to be completely oblivious to the game of basketball and those around me who obviously have more knowledge. But its not my right to take my rediculous opinion and state it as fact.
Again, your not too smart... Its not a Smush Parker/Derek Fisher question.. Ariza was crucial in the playoffs.. Offense and defense. Try to compare oranges to oranges next time. If Artest does something dumb, which he usually does and it hurts the team....I'm gonna say I told you so..
A blind squirrel finds a nut every once in awhile. The pure volume of your negative anti-laker posts suggests that sooner or later you might actually call something correct. You dont even believe many of your own ridiculous posts as witnessed by your refusal to back it up last year.
.... so go ahead and say you told us so when you actually get something correct. I certainly wont be holding my breath.
I love good wholesome debate!
 |
_________________ Stay Thirsty My Friends!
Last edited by spankees on Nov 04, 2009 - 06:32 PM PST; edited 1 time in total
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
gemfow
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 06:31 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM


Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Posts: 3343
Location: Maryland

  votes: 42
Status: Offline
|
|
| 4Lakers: When we do face the likes of Melo, Lebron, etc.. Let's take into account that it's a total team effort to stop those players, not just one person locking down. I've always thought that Sefolosha has done a pretty good job of guarding Kobe, however it was the big men coming over to help that paid dividends. Just like the two times we played the CAVS last season, the Lakers switching on screens helped us tremendously because we are one of the few teams who can switch on Lebron and have multiple people guard him. The main thing we can only hope for from Ron is that he makes these guys work for each and every shot. |
_________________ "It made me feel like I should throw mine away." - Larry Bird, upon hearing that Kobe hadn't earned the MVP trophy until this year.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
4lakers
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 07:46 PM PST
|
|
Die-Hard Laker Fan


Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Posts: 1868
Location: Los Angeles

   votes: 26
Status: Offline
|
|
|
gemfow wrote:
4Lakers: When we do face the likes of Melo, Lebron, etc.. Let's take into account that it's a total team effort to stop those players, not just one person locking down. I've always thought that Sefolosha has done a pretty good job of guarding Kobe, however it was the big men coming over to help that paid dividends. Just like the two times we played the CAVS last season, the Lakers switching on screens helped us tremendously because we are one of the few teams who can switch on Lebron and have multiple people guard him. The main thing we can only hope for from Ron is that he makes these guys work for each and every shot.
Very true. With so many picks - and some teams are masters of multiple picks - like Utah - it does always come down to team defense. Often when a poor center has to sit down with fouls, it is because the guards or small forward got broken up on top.
However, unless a team is playing zone and guarding an area instead of man-to-man - then the primary responsibility does fall on the man you are guarding - unless a good pick comes.
There are certainly players with a resume that notes that they are shot blockers or shot makers - same with defense. Artest's resume is that he is a great defender and people expect to see very good defense. For instance, if Camby stopped being a great shot blocker - then one would naturally question what was wrong with Camby. When Sasha can't hit a three - people wonder why.
Same with Artest or in a prior lifetime Bruce Bowen. People expect a lot from players that are known for certain qualities like a defensive stopper. Artest wears that label proudly and this is part of his NBA resume - so fans are going to expect great defense.
He has shown against Joe Johnson - that he can be that vaunted defensive stopper. If he can do this against other great small forwards in the league - AND if he gets some help from his team - then his acquisition will surely prove to be a wise one. However, if he proves to be too slow at this point in his career to play high level defense against the good small forwards in the league - then we have an undersized power forward for three years that can on certain nights light it up from the three and pass well - but not give us what we thought he would bring. |
_________________ Hey Orlando, do you like fishsticks? I hope so because Derek Fisher gave you a double serving in LA’s 97-91 OT victory.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
gemfow
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 04, 2009 - 11:48 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM


Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Posts: 3343
Location: Maryland

  votes: 42
Status: Offline
|
|
| 4Lakers: You're right about a man still having to defend his assignment on defense. What I've noticed is that even if you beat Artest he is still right there with you and that's all you can ask for. It all depends on our bigs rotating over. There is a big difference between getting a step on Artest and getting a step on someone like Fish or Farmar. Artest isn't beat badly and he can still usually get a hand on the ball, so I think we are fine. Artest has looked good defensively so far. |
_________________ "It made me feel like I should throw mine away." - Larry Bird, upon hearing that Kobe hadn't earned the MVP trophy until this year.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Cobbler
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 05, 2009 - 12:27 AM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan


Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 734
     votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
If you watched the game tonight... this debate can be put to rest.
If Artest shot 5-21 we would have 1,000 posts here why the offseason moves where a bust and the Lakers are going nowhere.
Where are those doubters????? |
_________________ "The obvious thing is you understand the season is meant for a growth process,and you hope your playoff position is good enough you can make an effort in the playoffs." Phil Jackson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
urkle9
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 05, 2009 - 12:53 AM PST
|
|
Laker GM

Joined: Oct 06, 2008
Posts: 3651

  votes: 16
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Cobbler wrote:
urkle9 wrote:
COnDEMnED wrote:
FISH+SWISH wrote:
why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING!
This is right in a sence, but If I made numerous posts about how Smush Parker was the best player to walk the face of the earth, and the Lakers were lucky to have him, and ignored everyone who tried to tell me otherwise, would I have a right to my opinion? Sure. Would everyone else have the right to tell me what an idiot I am. Absolutely. Its my opinion and my right to be completely oblivious to the game of basketball and those around me who obviously have more knowledge. But its not my right to take my rediculous opinion and state it as fact.
Again, your not too smart... Its not a Smush Parker/Derek Fisher question.. Ariza was crucial in the playoffs.. Offense and defense. Try to compare oranges to oranges next time. If Artest does something dumb, which he usually does and it hurts the team....I'm gonna say I told you so..
A blind squirrel finds a nut every once in awhile. The pure volume of your negative anti-laker posts suggests that sooner or later you might actually call something correct. You dont even believe many of your own ridiculous posts as witnessed by your refusal to back it up last year.
.... so go ahead and say you told us so when you actually get something correct. I certainly wont be holding my breath.
whatever... I'm sick and tired of making wheel chair jokes. so call me anti laker all you want. Yes I'm anti laker i want to see them lose I hope they dont even make the playoffs.. does that make you happy. Shut up and debate the issue.. yes im anti laker, get it out of your system already. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Cobbler
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Artest vs. Ariza
Posted: Nov 05, 2009 - 01:08 AM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan


Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 734
     votes: 14
Status: Offline
|
|
|
urkle9 wrote:
Cobbler wrote:
urkle9 wrote:
COnDEMnED wrote:
FISH+SWISH wrote:
why are people always mad at urkle? LTB is a forum which gives people the right to exress the way they feel and allows them to post their own opinions. . .it's much better than having a forum where everyone agreed, that would be BORING!
This is right in a sence, but If I made numerous posts about how Smush Parker was the best player to walk the face of the earth, and the Lakers were lucky to have him, and ignored everyone who tried to tell me otherwise, would I have a right to my opinion? Sure. Would everyone else have the right to tell me what an idiot I am. Absolutely. Its my opinion and my right to be completely oblivious to the game of basketball and those around me who obviously have more knowledge. But its not my right to take my rediculous opinion and state it as fact.
Again, your not too smart... Its not a Smush Parker/Derek Fisher question.. Ariza was crucial in the playoffs.. Offense and defense. Try to compare oranges to oranges next time. If Artest does something dumb, which he usually does and it hurts the team....I'm gonna say I told you so..
A blind squirrel finds a nut every once in awhile. The pure volume of your negative anti-laker posts suggests that sooner or later you might actually call something correct. You dont even believe many of your own ridiculous posts as witnessed by your refusal to back it up last year.
.... so go ahead and say you told us so when you actually get something correct. I certainly wont be holding my breath.
whatever... I'm sick and tired of making wheel chair jokes. so call me anti laker all you want. Yes I'm anti laker i want to see them lose I hope they dont even make the playoffs.. does that make you happy. Shut up and debate the issue.. yes im anti laker, get it out of your system already.
Thanks for finally admiting it.
... and I did adress the "issue". The question was asked why you get so much grief for your negative posts. I answered.
You can make all the wheelchair jokes you wish. It doenst bother me in the least. Only shows your class and character. I just like to point it out becaue... well... your easy. BTW.... I didnt say you were anti-laker. I said your posts are and they are. I even qualified it by saying you dont even believe a lot of your own posts. You really should get your facts correct before you post.
BTW... nice positive post in the gameday thread! I'm proud if ya! |
_________________ "The obvious thing is you understand the season is meant for a growth process,and you hope your playoff position is good enough you can make an effort in the playoffs." Phil Jackson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|