| Author |
Message |
cuckooroller
|
|
Post subject: RE: Sasha
 Posted: Jul 02, 2008 - 02:12 PM PST
|
|
Lakers Topbuzz Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 27, 2008 Age: 59
Posts: 7798
Location: Italy
  
votes: 76
Status: Offline
|
|
| Did somebody say we wanted Landry? If so, I missed it. I think that Caz intended that Houston, who has already made a qualifying offer for their own player, Landry, are interested in resigning him... |
_________________
Steve
"Sasha Vujacic. The All-Time YWCA Scoring Leader".
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Axle
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Sasha
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 - 02:20 PM PST
|
|
Laker GM
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Posts: 4113
votes: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
| I misunderstood his post. I think he ment the Rockets wanted to sign Landry. Me BAD! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
lakerfan420
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 - 06:10 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan
Joined: Oct 09, 2007 Age: 29
Posts: 951
Location: Jenison, MI
votes: 2
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Axle wrote:
As far as I am concerned Sasha is better player then Luke, and Luke got 25 million for five years.
Agree. And you mean to tell me that the Lakers can't afford to go over the cap? Between going to a game at Staples and all the stuff I've gotten for my family, I donated over a thousand dollars myself this last season. And I know I'm not the only one, lol. But I don't think it's for real anyway. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
bobbylight
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 - 10:22 PM PST
|
|
Serious Laker Fan
Joined: Jul 24, 2007
Posts: 490
votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
| Yup Sasha is indeed better than Luke because competitive fire brings a player's stock up... and Sasha has way more in that department than Fluke.. not to mention he can drain a shot more consistently. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
VujacicSlovenia
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 - 10:24 PM PST
|
|
Lakers Topbuzz Hall of Famer
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: 5689
votes: 48
Status: Offline
|
|
|
lakerfan420 wrote:
Axle wrote:
As far as I am concerned Sasha is better player then Luke, and Luke got 25 million for five years.
Agree. And you mean to tell me that the Lakers can't afford to go over the cap? Between going to a game at Staples and all the stuff I've gotten for my family, I donated over a thousand dollars myself this last season. And I know I'm not the only one, lol. But I don't think it's for real anyway.
Yeah, but you can't really look at it like that. I mean, I'm sure many people would say that Vujacic was 5 times more important than Walton, but the Lakers can't obviously give him 125 million.... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
lakerfan420
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 - 10:36 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan
Joined: Oct 09, 2007 Age: 29
Posts: 951
Location: Jenison, MI
votes: 2
Status: Offline
|
|
|
VujacicSlovenia wrote:
lakerfan420 wrote:
Axle wrote:
As far as I am concerned Sasha is better player then Luke, and Luke got 25 million for five years.
Agree. And you mean to tell me that the Lakers can't afford to go over the cap? Between going to a game at Staples and all the stuff I've gotten for my family, I donated over a thousand dollars myself this last season. And I know I'm not the only one, lol. But I don't think it's for real anyway.
Yeah, but you can't really look at it like that. I mean, I'm sure many people would say that Vujacic was 5 times more important than Walton, but the Lakers can't obviously give him 125 million....
I wasn't saying that but 30 over 6 is not unrealistic. Maybe a little high but compared to other salaries not really. And I'm not saying paying 125 million a yr but the Lakers CAN AFFORD to pay a little luxury tax without hindering the team's financial future or success. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
nightrain42
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 02, 2008 - 10:49 PM PST
|
|
Big-Time Laker Fan
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 626
Location: texas
votes: 1
Status: Offline
|
|
|
lakerfan420 wrote:
VujacicSlovenia wrote:
lakerfan420 wrote:
Axle wrote:
As far as I am concerned Sasha is better player then Luke, and Luke got 25 million for five years.
Agree. And you mean to tell me that the Lakers can't afford to go over the cap? Between going to a game at Staples and all the stuff I've gotten for my family, I donated over a thousand dollars myself this last season. And I know I'm not the only one, lol. But I don't think it's for real anyway.
Yeah, but you can't really look at it like that. I mean, I'm sure many people would say that Vujacic was 5 times more important than Walton, but the Lakers can't obviously give him 125 million....
I wasn't saying that but 30 over 6 is not unrealistic. Maybe a little high but compared to other salaries not really. And I'm not saying paying 125 million a yr but the Lakers CAN AFFORD to pay a little luxury tax without hindering the team's financial future or success.
It's all about timing, Luke was in the right place, w/the right team who was desperate to keep him. Sasha is more valuable to us, but now, the timing is different. It's just like Devean George a few years ago. I wnt to keep Sasha, but not at $30 mil. We already have 2 bad contract players in Luke and Vlad. Don't forget, this was Sasha's 1st break out year. Caution Please. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Sub-Category
